Home TRENDING SC SENDS NOTICES IN RESPONSE TO G-B CM’S PETITION

SC SENDS NOTICES IN RESPONSE TO G-B CM’S PETITION

SC SENDS NOTICES IN RESPONSE TO G-B CM'S PETITION

SHARE

In response to the petition submitted by the G-B CM, the Supreme Court has issued notices and has postponed the hearing until March 1.

Police officers walk past the Supreme Court of Pakistan building, in Islamabad, Pakistan April 6, 2022. REUTERS/Akhtar Soomro

ISLAMABAD: On Tuesday, the Supreme Court served notices on the respondents to the constitutional petition filed by Chief Minister Khalid Khurshid Khan of Gilgit-Baltistan, which contested the government’s appointment of a judge and the extension granted to three judges of the chief court for the region.

The case was considered by a three-judge panel of the supreme court, which also included Justices Munib Akhtar and Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi. Speaking on behalf of the G-B CEO was Makhdoom Ali Khan.

Moreover, Shehzad Ata Elahi, Pakistan’s attorney general and a respondent in the plea, received notice.

The petitioner’s request to modify the complaint contesting the appointment of Chief Judge Supreme Appellate Court (SAC) G-B Sardar Shamim Khan was granted by the bench.

The case’s hearing was postponed until March 1.

Five months later, the constitutional petition was heard by the Supreme Court.

Via a prominent attorney named Makhdoom Ali Khan, the chief minister filed a case under Article 184(3) of the Constitution in September of last year, designating the federal government, the governor of G-B, and recently appointed Chief Court Judge Javed Ahmed as respondents.

As a result of a summary motion made by G-B Governor Syed Mahdi Shah, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had granted an extension to three judges of the G-B Chief Court on September 16. But the summary was started without the chief minister’s input.

Eventually, the petition was returned by the Registrar’s Office with seven objections. The G-B CM responded to the objections in the interim by submitting an appeal in the chamber, which Judge Munib Akhtar heard.

SHARE